<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Management by Objectives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Objectives: Are You Doin&#8217; It Right? &#124; Strategic Technology</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html#comment-83316</link>
		<dc:creator>Objectives: Are You Doin&#8217; It Right? &#124; Strategic Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=904#comment-83316</guid>
		<description>[...] great conversation at Julien Dionne&#8217;s Leapcomp regarding performance measurement via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] great conversation at Julien Dionne&#8217;s Leapcomp regarding performance measurement via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Ross</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html#comment-5186</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=904#comment-5186</guid>
		<description>@Kerek - it works across all roles

I am a tech manager - lets say that the corporate goals are to a) increase sales by 20% b) decrease defects by 20% c) etc.

As a tech manager - my goals can then be aligned - is what I am doing assisting sales meet that target? or reducing that defect rate?

Strategically we can look at the project 'wish list' and point to the one or two that affect those goals.

And operationally I could say that ensuring sales has 24/7 support any where in the world if they have a problem, to enable them to reach that goal, or provide whatever necessary support to reduce defects.

So it can go right down the line</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kerek - it works across all roles</p>
<p>I am a tech manager - lets say that the corporate goals are to a) increase sales by 20% b) decrease defects by 20% c) etc.</p>
<p>As a tech manager - my goals can then be aligned - is what I am doing assisting sales meet that target? or reducing that defect rate?</p>
<p>Strategically we can look at the project &#8216;wish list&#8217; and point to the one or two that affect those goals.</p>
<p>And operationally I could say that ensuring sales has 24/7 support any where in the world if they have a problem, to enable them to reach that goal, or provide whatever necessary support to reduce defects.</p>
<p>So it can go right down the line</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=904#comment-5150</guid>
		<description>It applies to both.  Selling roles are often compensated based on sales, but MBOs are often used to re-enforce certain behaviors by measuring other metrics, such as customer satisfaction.  

However, virtually every job can be and should be rewarded by MBOs.  It's the "art" of tying a reward to a specific outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It applies to both.  Selling roles are often compensated based on sales, but MBOs are often used to re-enforce certain behaviors by measuring other metrics, such as customer satisfaction.  </p>
<p>However, virtually every job can be and should be rewarded by MBOs.  It&#8217;s the &#8220;art&#8221; of tying a reward to a specific outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerek Taylor</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html#comment-5147</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerek Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=904#comment-5147</guid>
		<description>Alright now I'm confused.  Is this post to advocate for MBO applied to selling roles (i.e. front office) or back office operational type roles?

Kerek Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright now I&#8217;m confused.  Is this post to advocate for MBO applied to selling roles (i.e. front office) or back office operational type roles?</p>
<p>Kerek Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html#comment-5129</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=904#comment-5129</guid>
		<description>Elliot, I think you're 100% right.  Setting the objectives is the most important part of MBOs, and that's something that no technology can do for you.  

Kerek, spreadsheets are databases are not always a bad option for very small organizations, where it is practical to e-mail things back and forth.  However, it doesn't take very long for an organization to outgrow such a system.  That's a case where more often than not, a client probably has some process in place, but the process can be made much more efficient through technology.  Even if the current process does work, the next question is, does it deliver the proper business intelligence.  I'll talk a bit more about the general process in my next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elliot, I think you&#8217;re 100% right.  Setting the objectives is the most important part of MBOs, and that&#8217;s something that no technology can do for you.  </p>
<p>Kerek, spreadsheets are databases are not always a bad option for very small organizations, where it is practical to e-mail things back and forth.  However, it doesn&#8217;t take very long for an organization to outgrow such a system.  That&#8217;s a case where more often than not, a client probably has some process in place, but the process can be made much more efficient through technology.  Even if the current process does work, the next question is, does it deliver the proper business intelligence.  I&#8217;ll talk a bit more about the general process in my next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerek Taylor</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html#comment-5119</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerek Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=904#comment-5119</guid>
		<description>Elliot -

My read on this post was the application of MBO to operational non selling roles.  I could be wrong, but otherwise aren't we just talking about glorified quota alignment?  

JLD -

We had a couple sections on MBO in b-school.  I always thought about it from a practical standpoint as glorified goal setting, but this article definitely sheds some new light, great job!

However, as a process and P&#38;L guy I would definitely want to work to understand the clients process around MBO (if one even exist) prior to simply recommending a solution.  Spreadsheets and dBs aren't always the worst options, especially when you examine the costs side of things.

Kerek Taylor
cariboucrossing.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elliot -</p>
<p>My read on this post was the application of MBO to operational non selling roles.  I could be wrong, but otherwise aren&#8217;t we just talking about glorified quota alignment?  </p>
<p>JLD -</p>
<p>We had a couple sections on MBO in b-school.  I always thought about it from a practical standpoint as glorified goal setting, but this article definitely sheds some new light, great job!</p>
<p>However, as a process and P&amp;L guy I would definitely want to work to understand the clients process around MBO (if one even exist) prior to simply recommending a solution.  Spreadsheets and dBs aren&#8217;t always the worst options, especially when you examine the costs side of things.</p>
<p>Kerek Taylor<br />
cariboucrossing.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Ross</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/03/management-by-objectives.html#comment-5091</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=904#comment-5091</guid>
		<description>Julien - I have seen MBO work quite well - I believe that in many cases where it does *not* it is due to lack of alighnment - and I mean direct, neasureable 100% specific alignment with corporate goals.

Those cannot be goals like 'be the best we can be...'

They must be "increase sales by 20% across all regions"

Then the managerial goals must be for their region - &#38; what it will take to meet those goals.

Ditto for the rep athe end!

Great post &#38; thanks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julien - I have seen MBO work quite well - I believe that in many cases where it does *not* it is due to lack of alighnment - and I mean direct, neasureable 100% specific alignment with corporate goals.</p>
<p>Those cannot be goals like &#8216;be the best we can be&#8230;&#8217;</p>
<p>They must be &#8220;increase sales by 20% across all regions&#8221;</p>
<p>Then the managerial goals must be for their region - &amp; what it will take to meet those goals.</p>
<p>Ditto for the rep athe end!</p>
<p>Great post &amp; thanks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

