<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which SPM Vendor “Sucks” the Most?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leapcomp.com/2009/02/which-spm-vendor-%e2%80%9csucks%e2%80%9d-the-most.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/02/which-spm-vendor-%e2%80%9csucks%e2%80%9d-the-most.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julien Dionne</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/02/which-spm-vendor-%e2%80%9csucks%e2%80%9d-the-most.html#comment-4592</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Dionne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=826#comment-4592</guid>
		<description>Yes, 3 good points.  I think that most people realize the potential of having a solution oversold to them.  We should keep in mind that that's often unintentional...  the sales executive may not have known some of the limitation of their product, or may not have had a good understanding of the client's requirements.  

That's why more and more people contact me and OpenSymmetry to help them out with some of their requirement gathering, readiness assessment and vendor selection efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 3 good points.  I think that most people realize the potential of having a solution oversold to them.  We should keep in mind that that&#8217;s often unintentional&#8230;  the sales executive may not have known some of the limitation of their product, or may not have had a good understanding of the client&#8217;s requirements.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why more and more people contact me and OpenSymmetry to help them out with some of their requirement gathering, readiness assessment and vendor selection efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerek Taylor</title>
		<link>http://leapcomp.com/2009/02/which-spm-vendor-%e2%80%9csucks%e2%80%9d-the-most.html#comment-4350</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerek Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leapcomp.com/?p=826#comment-4350</guid>
		<description>Another good posts!  I think there are a combination of factors that leave clients dissatisfied.  

1.  Poorly managed vendor/servicer expectations.  As a nascent analyst I had clients tell me on more than one occassion they were oversold by execs of both.

2.  Planning/Analysis.  Clients many times are caught up in the sexiness of the technology that they forget to be active partners in these things.  I like to think the actual software is subordinate to the process that encompass it.

3.  Execution.  Every project gets bogged down.  Every single one.  Response by leadership both client, servicer and vendor is key.  Once the blame game starts it's hard to re-rail.

Kerek Taylor
cariboucrossing.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good posts!  I think there are a combination of factors that leave clients dissatisfied.  </p>
<p>1.  Poorly managed vendor/servicer expectations.  As a nascent analyst I had clients tell me on more than one occassion they were oversold by execs of both.</p>
<p>2.  Planning/Analysis.  Clients many times are caught up in the sexiness of the technology that they forget to be active partners in these things.  I like to think the actual software is subordinate to the process that encompass it.</p>
<p>3.  Execution.  Every project gets bogged down.  Every single one.  Response by leadership both client, servicer and vendor is key.  Once the blame game starts it&#8217;s hard to re-rail.</p>
<p>Kerek Taylor<br />
cariboucrossing.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

